The Philadelphia Inquirer
Post Link: http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/20101221_Country_is_ready_for_more_high-speed_rail.html
The Philadelphia Inquirer
Post Link: http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/20101221_Country_is_ready_for_more_high-speed_rail.html
The Eau Claire City Council has unanimously declared its support for the continuation of the development of high speed passenger rail in Wisconsin.
In a 10-0 vote, the Council urged the state, and Governor-elect Scott Walker, to go forward with plans to build the Madison extension of the Chicago-Milwaukee Hiawatha service. Council members noted that the line is an important next step to extending service to the Twin Cities, which Eau Claire hopes includes a routing via West Central Wisconsin.
Adopted last Tuesday, the resolution states:
“The City Council of the City of Eau Claire strongly endorses the continued efforts of the State of Wisconsin to work with all regions of the state to build a balanced transportation system that enhances mobility choices and strengthens the state’s global economic competitiveness.”
“The City Council strongly supports the continued development of a high speed passenger rail and integrated transportation network in Wisconsin, including the completion of a high speed passenger rail route from Milwaukee to St. Paul, and the completion of the engineering, environmental, and other essential impact analyses currently scheduled.”
“The City Council strongly supports the retention of the more than $800 million in federal funding support allocated to Wisconsin for the development of passenger rail and urges the State of Wisconsin to remain true to the approved plan for the investment of these funds in our state for the creation of jobs, economic growth and passenger rail.”
During the public hearing portion of the Council’s deliberations last Monday, Rail Coalition Co-Chair Scott Rogers was invited to give a presentation on the history and status of efforts to secure passenger rail service for Eau Claire. Several citizens also spoke up in support of the resolution, which was sponsored by Council Members Jackie Pavelski and Dana Wachs. Click here for the full text.
TBO
“We don’t need a high-speed train.” This all-too-common sentiment is short-sighted.
The U.S. Department of Transportation’s allocation of hundreds of millions of dollars is the latest major headway Florida has made on the high-speed rail front. However, individuals continually attempt to politicize new transit projects without understanding the full benefits.
First, transit creates jobs — thousands of them — and not only just short-term jobs from construction. The Surface Transportation Policy Partnership estimated that transit creates 19 percent more jobs than building roads because transit additionally creates sustained, long-term jobs from train maintenance, operation and dispatch. The construction job market has one of the highest unemployment rates, and for us to move beyond the recession we need to jump-start the economy. Transit can do this better than roadways.
Second, America has an addiction to foreign oil that is a major threat to our national security. With so much of our nation’s energy needs met by petroleum, Florida’s and America’s energy economy is dangerously at the mercy of other international oil producers like Venezuela, Libya and Iran. Not only does public transit use less fuel per person (taking pressure off demand), but it has the capacity of being fully electric. We need a transportation infrastructure that is dependent on nothing but the work of Americans.
Further, high-speed rail has a market of riders. There is a travel range where it is uncomfortable to drive but just not worth the hassle to fly. For distances of 100 to 500 miles it is ideal to take a train. A recent study for the American Public Transit Association (APTA) found that 62 percent of Americans definitely, or probably, would use rail, compared to 11 percent who probably or definitely would not, and 27 percent were not sure.
High-speed rail will not drive Central Florida bankrupt, especially since Central Florida is not paying most of the bill. The vast majority of high-speed rail lines run at surplus profits. So much so, that in other countries profits often help subsidize local light-rail lines. As far as investments go, this train is pretty secure.
Study after study and example after example have shown high-speed rail to be a worthwhile investment. The London School of Economics and Political Science demonstrated that towns connected by rail saw a 2.7 percent increase in growth compared to neighboring, unconnected towns.
In addition to creating jobs, rail provides increased mobility and, thus, better access to jobs, goods, services and other markets. Just like the national highway project after the Great Depression, Florida and our nation need to make investments that will encourage new growth.
The new 2060 Florida Transportation Plan estimates a 70 percent population increase in the state over the next 50 years. Viably, we cannot continue an infinite road expansion. Our current pace of road construction is outpacing our ability to maintain the current network.
Our highways cannot sustain 70 percent more people who drive more and longer distances. A single railway, however, can support the traffic of a six-lane highway. Highways may be adequate now, but we cannot give in to naivety. We must keep the future in mind.
Patrick Gittard is a transit issue associate for the Florida Public Interest Research Group, based in Tallahassee.
Post Link: http://www2.tbo.com/content/2010/nov/10/PMEOPINO1-a-fast-way-to-jump-start-economy/
The New York Times
An Investment We Have to Make
Robert D. Yaro is the president of Regional Plan Association, a policy, research and advocacy group, and professor of practice in city and regional planning at the University of Pennsylvania.
Building a national high-speed rail system shouldn’t be a partisan issue. But it’s becoming that way because of the hyper-partisanship in the country and the conviction of many on the right that public investments of this kind are in some way “un-American.”
High-speed rail will expand our economy, just as the Interstate highway system did in the 20th century.
This couldn’t be farther from the truth. Throughout history, our nation’s leaders championed federal investments in infrastructure. Washington led efforts to build canals right after the Revolution, Lincoln led efforts to build the Trans-Continental Railroad during the Civil War, and Eisenhower led efforts to build the Interstate highways during the Cold War. It is altogether appropriate for President Obama to lead efforts to build a national high-speed rail system now.
High-speed rail won’t work everywhere in the country. But it’s perfectly suited to the needs of America’s 11 emerging megaregions, home to 70 percent of Americans. These are densely populated places like the Northeast where metro areas share economic sectors, infrastructure and natural systems.
In most of these places existing highways and airports are severely congested and have little potential for expansion. In California, for example, a high-speed system can be a much more cost-effective way to provide needed mobility, compared with new or expanded highways and runways.
And at 100 to 600 miles across, megaregions are well suited for high-speed rail because they are too large for convenient car travel and too small for efficient air travel. High-speed systems have the potential to expand labor and housing markets and create new agglomerations in cutting edge industries.
For these reasons Japan, China, Taiwan and Europe — and now Brazil, South Africa, Morocco, India and Vietnam — already have or are building high-speed rail. Unless we build similar systems here, we will find ourselves at a growing competitive disadvantage caused by increasing congestion and inefficiency in moving people and goods.
At an estimated $500 billion, a national high-speed rail system won’t come cheap. But it will help enable a major expansion in the U.S. gross domestic product by mid-century, in much the same way the Interstate highways did in the 20th century. Once completed with forms of public financing, these systems can be operated and maintained by the private sector and operated at a profit. We can’t afford not to build a national high-speed system. It’s not the only infrastructure investment needed to secure our economic futures. But it’s one that will be essential to our future mobility and competitiveness.
USDOT – Secretary Ray LaHood
With his vigorous support for high-speed rail, President Obama is thinking about a better future. And so is the Department of Transportation. We’re moving America forward for all Americans.
The bottom line is that high-speed rail will deliver a more efficient downtown-to-downtown mobility; it will spur economic development; it will bring manufacturing jobs to the US; and it will move us to a cleaner, greener way of getting around.
In the coming weeks, we’ll be rolling out even more grants to help write the next chapter in American innovation.
We’re talking about nothing short of transforming transportation much the same way the interstate highway system did under President Eisenhower. Can you imagine if Ohio or Wisconsin or any other state had said, “No, thanks–we don’t think that highway thing is going anywhere?”
The fact is that–as with much of the Recovery Act–I keep hearing objections being expressed in the media while at the same time my office phone is ringing off the hook with calls from elected officials of both parties competing feverishly for a rail corridor in their state! I’ve never heard from anyone saying, “Don’t put my constituents to work.”
Look, the people vowing to send this train back to the station are missing the boat, so to speak. High speed rail will offer states’ incredible economic opportunities. It means jobs for workers, it means manufacturing opportunities and it means economic development corridors.
If you think the United States can afford not to compete with the European and Asian nations who have embraced high-speed rail and other innovative infrastructure, I urge you to read “Investing in our Economic Future,” by Dr. T. Peter Ruane, or “Well Within Reach: America’s New Transportation Agenda,” by the David R. Goode National Transportation Policy Conference. Both of these reports tell the same story: We cannot delay mustering the courage to build a 21st century foundation for our 21st century economy.
Neither President Obama nor I will be content to sit around and watch other countries maintain a transportation advantage over us.
We know there are dozens of companies that want to build plants and hire American workers. We have already received commitments from over 30 companies in the rail business to create or expand US rail manufacturing should they be awarded contracts for portions of this money. These companies know high-speed rail, and they are ready to become partners to the states or regions awarded rail grants.
Will we say, “No,” to the future–to jobs and growth?
Just like the interstate highway system, the wired telephone has been a fantastic springboard to American economic strength. But that didn’t stop the communications companies from embracing the innovation offered by wireless. And look at what that investment has made possible.
We will always use our roadways; they continue to serve us well, and DOT is not about to turn our backs on them. But now is the time to invest in the next technological wave in transportation and leverage it toward a better future for all of us.